Heidegger life and Philosophy 1 of 6
BackHeidegger life and Philosophy
Channel: Entertainment
Uploaded: May 29, 2007 at 10:17 am
Author: wtsbqm
Length: 00:08:39
Rating: 4.78
Views: 52305
Tags: Heidegger Philosophy Existencialism Phenomenologie
Video Comments:
patokosz (December 5, 2008 at 12:11 pm)
this documentation i highly in-de-consctructive, which means that has no remarks to object Heideggers' lecture.
heideggercrack (November 20, 2008 at 6:46 pm)
Hace dos meses que estoy estudiando el tomo 2 del Nietzsche de Heidegger y tengo que decir que me parece un pensador brillante, sobretodo sus esbozos existencialistas. Me sorprende y me perturba su concepto de angustia.
codadilupo83 (November 15, 2008 at 3:05 pm)
In my opinion, you don't understand nothing of philosophy. In particular, Nietzsche were not a advocate of totalitarism. Heidegger, with Husserl, Foucault, Paci, Banfi, Derrida, Merleau-Ponty and Sini was one of the most importanto philosopher of the 20th century.
rabmunch (November 2, 2008 at 7:59 pm)
If one wants to understand the spirit of Heidegger, the trajectory of his kind of thinking, and the nerve of his idea of Dasein, the essays of Leo Strauss on Heideggerian "Existentialism" are invaluable.
These can be accessed freely at "internet archive [dot] org", searching under the terms "Strauss" & "Heidegger". Many other related useful texts are also down-loadable there (on Husserl, for instance).
These can be accessed freely at "internet archive [dot] org", searching under the terms "Strauss" & "Heidegger". Many other related useful texts are also down-loadable there (on Husserl, for instance).
Facade19 (November 6, 2008 at 7:50 pm)
rabmunch, is Farabi's Plato an existentialist, the grand artist who is aware of the abyss and understands that the prophet is one of the greatest artists?
rabmunch (November 6, 2008 at 11:26 pm)
Neither Farabi nor Plato are existentialists.
Neither Farabi nor Plato thought there was an "abyss".
They teach that there is something, an order, that they call "nature". If there is "nature", there can be no "abyss". A "abyss" necessarily implies that there is no intelligible order, and that man is almost damned to ignorance and confusion, or forbidden to know an order.
Neither Farabi nor Plato thought there was an "abyss".
They teach that there is something, an order, that they call "nature". If there is "nature", there can be no "abyss". A "abyss" necessarily implies that there is no intelligible order, and that man is almost damned to ignorance and confusion, or forbidden to know an order.
Facade19 (December 5, 2008 at 3:40 am)
rabmunch, now I understand what you meant with natural order. Modern thinking has crippled me from the intrinsic order of nature, until I have encountered the fourth Lecture and the falisafa's reading of the falisafa's reading of the Laws. Brilliant and revealing. Law as the reconstruction of natural order and law in civil society and social order. Law not as faith, but as the Perfect Social Order.
ludachris475 (November 2, 2008 at 7:28 pm)
Gesundheit.
rabmunch (November 2, 2008 at 7:59 pm)
Danke
736814 (November 2, 2008 at 6:52 pm)
hahahah