Three WTC shots all taken at same location
BackLuckiest "amateur" house near WTC on 9/11.
'TinaCart1':
Robert Clark (Professional photographer):
Wolfgang Staehle (Video artist, internet-art pioneer.):
by Killtown
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: October 28, 2007 at 1:28 am
Author: WelcomeToKilltown
Length: 00:01:50
Rating: 4.17
Views: 33517
Tags: 9/11 conspiracy wtc plane crash tv-fakery united september 11th
Video Comments:
toastedhippy (October 29, 2008 at 3:01 pm)
"So the collapse of the tower must be an almost free fall." From 416 m to less than 25 m in about 9 sec. From Bazant and Zhou; Why Did The Towers Fall---I got this off a debunker sight and it is part of the official explaination. Personally I hope my suspicions are unfounded but the debunkers don't really prove anything.
nelcasino (October 8, 2008 at 11:07 am)
i agree m8.and why on earth would someone record cctv images of that view anyway.i have cctv and its positioned a little more protectively of my property then a harbour
dallyborr (October 7, 2008 at 10:54 pm)
And...what a hell you trying to proof!!!???
Fuckin IDIOT!
Fuckin IDIOT!
SmokeMyBlunt (October 8, 2008 at 10:20 am)
if you dont get the point he is trying to make...then why call him a fucking idiot? your the one not getting the point...so...look at yourself before trying to offend him?
Sharpster7 (November 18, 2008 at 1:02 pm)
trying to proove that steel beams don't suddenly vaporize at the same second to allow shrapnel to fall at a free-fall speed... unless of course explosives were used.
bettercap (October 1, 2008 at 2:13 pm)
well thats a bit of a problem tell them to prove that was in totaly diffrent locations lol.
skulspike92 (September 30, 2008 at 6:11 pm)
...i didnt say anything like that...it just involved a small group in the government and that was it....no more no less...ur tens of thousands of people have nothin to do with this...go to the channel NuffRespect or something then click on conspiracy and comment back wen u saw them all and still think it wasnt a conspiracy
greenbone23 (September 29, 2008 at 4:58 pm)
Osama powerful? No. Cunning, patient, methodical, radical, well funded? Yes. The buildings didn't fall at "free-fall" speed. Recheck your facts. For example - WTC1 and 2 took 16-22 seconds to fall, not 9 seconds.
People that believe 9/11 was an inside job are not thinking clearly. Much easier to plant WMDs in Iraq (which wasn't done) than embark on a ridiculously massive and unmanageable self-mutilation reliant on thousands of co-conspirators.
Inside job? Absolutely absurd, ridiculous
People that believe 9/11 was an inside job are not thinking clearly. Much easier to plant WMDs in Iraq (which wasn't done) than embark on a ridiculously massive and unmanageable self-mutilation reliant on thousands of co-conspirators.
Inside job? Absolutely absurd, ridiculous
SunnyDaysRFun (September 30, 2008 at 1:10 am)
@greenbone.
OK, don't believe it was an inside Job. I don't care, there are millions of idiots that believe as you do and think Osama is this "methodical well funded" cave living bug. Shezzz. For me, inside job, with the laws of physics proving planned explosives brought the towers down, and video tapes of GW Bush lying about seeing the planes hit, and videos of WTC7 going straight down, and my own eyes that say, wait, NO WAY did those buildings come down by jet fuel! INSIDE JOB!
OK, don't believe it was an inside Job. I don't care, there are millions of idiots that believe as you do and think Osama is this "methodical well funded" cave living bug. Shezzz. For me, inside job, with the laws of physics proving planned explosives brought the towers down, and video tapes of GW Bush lying about seeing the planes hit, and videos of WTC7 going straight down, and my own eyes that say, wait, NO WAY did those buildings come down by jet fuel! INSIDE JOB!
coryhewer (October 18, 2008 at 2:06 pm)
patriot act ?
is more important
is more important