Ayn Rand
BackBrief clip of Ayn Rand
Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: July 8, 2006 at 9:21 am
Author: Equality72521
Length: 00:00:42
Rating: 4.59
Views: 93624
Tags: Ayn Rand New Intellectual Objectivism Fountainhead Atlas Shrugged John Galt
Video Comments:
vinnynumbnuts (January 7, 2009 at 6:59 pm)
Well, yeah, in that sense, of course. Sorry, my blunder. I meant he was dedicated to Ayn and her philosophy of objectivism out of love; not duty.
joyclean (January 7, 2009 at 2:33 pm)
making peikoff her executor, ayn
give him the fudiciary responsibility
and a duty to conduct her affairs. a
court gave her due process, which
was a duty; ayn is not repugnant to
duty.
give him the fudiciary responsibility
and a duty to conduct her affairs. a
court gave her due process, which
was a duty; ayn is not repugnant to
duty.
vinnynumbnuts (January 6, 2009 at 9:47 pm)
Tired, have to get in a few before graveyard. But no, I gave you Ayn Rand's exact words that Peikoff is right on the money about her philosophy, objectivism. Her words. Your idea of it's being "his duty" would be repugnant to her. And she never spoke out against him in the later years right up to her death bed. I think you would be surprised if you ever met her one on one.
The concept of identity was arrived implicitly to babies. Then became explicit with measurement ommis., etc. Refers back.
The concept of identity was arrived implicitly to babies. Then became explicit with measurement ommis., etc. Refers back.
bigpoo3001AD (January 6, 2009 at 4:11 pm)
pfft
go back to russia
go back to russia
joyclean (January 5, 2009 at 10:33 pm)
it was his duty to preserve the intellectual
integrity of ayn, as she got older. i do not
think he did. peikoff had to know that in
law of identity, a is a. he ignored the fact
that symbolic "a" has no actual referents
in the real world he says objectivism is to
come to terms with. furthermore there is
a subject-predicate form and the verb is
problematic as the basis of his thesis. in
integrity of ayn, as she got older. i do not
think he did. peikoff had to know that in
law of identity, a is a. he ignored the fact
that symbolic "a" has no actual referents
in the real world he says objectivism is to
come to terms with. furthermore there is
a subject-predicate form and the verb is
problematic as the basis of his thesis. in
joyclean (January 5, 2009 at 10:19 pm)
the subject is an implicit promise to
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual "a's " in object
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual "a's " in object
joyclean (January 5, 2009 at 10:11 pm)
the subject is an implicit promise to
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual as in object
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual as in object
joyclean (January 5, 2009 at 9:47 pm)
form are never completely identical, and to
use language structure falsely to make them
so, he commits an intellectual misdemeanor.
in no way does his action reflect on ayn.
use language structure falsely to make them
so, he commits an intellectual misdemeanor.
in no way does his action reflect on ayn.
vinnynumbnuts (January 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm)
I remember your reaction to Leonard Peikoff's book, "Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand." You described Peikoff as "the party" and "a pimp", and I think this is because he gives her more life and credit for her words than you would like. In Ayn Rand's book, "Anthem", it is said that Ayn wrote, "Dr. Peikoff's course is the only authorized presentation of the entire theoretical structure of Objectivism, ie., the only one that I know of my knowledge to be fully accurate,"
way that verbal symbols keep
inconsistent attitudes abstract
concepts and generally united
before they're seen particular
and actual. it is that long way
of saying, i'm the subject and
what i see is the object, then i .
classify it.